Back
Updated at: September 11, 2025
In 2025, most users perceive requests from applications as something ordinary: access to the camera, geolocation, contacts - everything by default. But behind this "by default" often lie much more serious issues: the collection of personal data, hidden tracking, potential vulnerabilities. Even verified applications from official stores can abuse trust.
So why do apps continue to request access to device features, even if everything seems to have already been granted? How can you distinguish a legitimate request from an unnecessary one? And is it even possible to control what the programs installed on your device are doing?
In this article, we will explain how the permission system works, what has changed in the latest versions of Android and iOS, and what this means for regular users, developers, and businesses.
Permissions are a mechanism of the operating system that allows controlling applications' access to sensitive functions and data. This is part of the security architecture.
There are three main categories of permissions:
Normal permissions - do not pose a significant risk (e.g., internet access) and are granted automatically.
Dangerous permissions - require user consent (e.g., camera, location, contacts).
Special permissions - pertain to system functions (e.g., displaying over other windows, battery management) and are configured manually through settings.
These mechanisms are part of the security system, but much depends on the application itself and its behavior.
A navigation app won't be able to show the route without access to your location.
Access is requested on demand: you turn on the camera - the app asks for permission.
Some permissions can be configured precisely: access only while in use, separately for Bluetooth and GPS, etc.
Simply put: applications have not become more curious - the system has become more transparent and demanding.
Advertising SDKs and trackers can use access to the microphone, contacts, and geolocation.
Some developers request permissions "just in case" - for future features or in case the functionality expands.
Device identifiers, Wi-Fi, application lists - all of this can be used for tracking.
In its early versions, TikTok collected clipboard data and had extensive access to geolocation.
Xiaomi recorded voice activity even with the screen off.
Zoom accessed the microphone and camera outside of conferences.
“Praemonitus praemunitus” - forewarned is forearmed.
Only specific steps and nothing extra:
Check what permissions you have granted to the installed applications.
Delete the apps you haven't used in a long time.
For location access, choose "only while using the app."
If the app asks for too much - look for an alternative.
Use trusted controller apps: DuckDuckGo App Tracking Protection , AdGuard and others. They will help you not get confused and bring order.
What rules and principles should be followed to maintain user trust, ensure the stable operation of the application, and avoid being banned by Google Play or the App Store?
Request access only when it is truly necessary.
When installing, request only the truly necessary minimum.
Explain to the user why the permission is specifically needed. Transparency and predictability are everything to us.
Take refusals into account and offer alternatives. The application should work correctly even without some permissions.
Scoped Storage (Android) - access to files through restricted areas.
Storage Access Framework - access through system dialogs.
PhotoPicker (iOS) - selection of individual photos without access to the entire gallery.
Comfort and enjoyment in using the application is a mutual contribution from both developers and users.
Therefore:
If you are a user, don't be lazy to read and understand what the application is requesting and whether there is any rational basis for it.
If you are a developer, maintaining a high standard of quality and user trust will be aided by the reasonableness and transparency of your application's requests.
If you are developing a mobile application or want to optimize an existing one, we will help you do it properly. We at We Can Develop IT keep up with the latest requirements of Android and iOS, adhere to store policies, consider user experience, and build permission architecture according to the best practices of 2025.
Contact us - and your product will be not only user-friendly but also safe for users.
Summary:
The article discusses the ongoing issue of app permission requests and their implications for user privacy. Users often encounter requests for access to sensitive features, which can raise concerns about data collection and tracking. Permissions are categorized into normal, dangerous, and special types, each requiring different levels of user consent. While some requests are legitimate and necessary for app functionality, others may be excessive or unnecessary. The article highlights that certain developers may request permissions for future features or simply to track users. It also cites examples of well-known apps with questionable permission practices in earlier versions. To protect themselves, users are advised to regularly review app permissions, delete unused apps, and opt for alternatives when permissions seem excessive. Developers are encouraged to request permissions sparingly, clearly explain their necessity, and ensure apps function without excessive access. Overall, maintaining user trust requires transparency and reasonable practices from both developers and users. The article concludes by emphasizing the importance of collaboration between users and developers to create a safe and enjoyable app experience.
Read also:
apppermissions
dataprivacy
smartphonesecurity
Android2025
iOS2025
apptracking
mobileprivacy
userdata
permissionsystem
locationaccess
camerapermission
contactpermission
appsecurity
privacysettings
digitalrights
cyberhygiene
appdevelopers
appstorepolicy
scopedstorage
photopicker
storageaccessframework
mobileappsafety
apptrackingprotection
apppermissionsguide
datasecurity2025